The AT2020 vs AT2035 question comes down to features and size: both are Audio-Technica cardioid condenser microphones aimed at home studios, but the AT2035 is a larger-diaphragm step up with a switchable low-cut filter and a -10 dB pad, plus a slightly lower self-noise. The AT2020 is the simpler, more affordable workhorse that has introduced countless beginners to real condenser recording.
What each microphone is
Both are side-address XLR condensers with a fixed cardioid pattern, and both need 48V phantom power from an interface. The AT2020 is the entry point in Audio-Technica’s studio line; the AT2035 sits a tier above with a larger diaphragm and onboard switches. For background on capsule size, see large vs small-diaphragm condensers.
The key differences
| AT2020 | AT2035 | |
|---|---|---|
| Diaphragm | Smaller capsule | Larger diaphragm |
| Low-cut filter | No | Yes (switchable) |
| Pad | No | Yes (-10 dB) |
| Self-noise | Higher | Lower |
| Included accessories | Stand mount | Shock mount |
| Pattern | Cardioid | Cardioid |
The AT2035’s pad lets it handle louder sources without distortion, and its low-cut helps control proximity-effect bass and rumble. It also ships with a shock mount rather than a basic stand clip — useful, since reducing handling noise matters; see what a shock mount does.
Sound
Both mics share Audio-Technica’s clear, slightly bright voicing. The AT2035’s larger diaphragm and lower self-noise give it a marginally fuller, smoother and quieter sound, which is noticeable on quiet vocal passages and detailed acoustic work. The AT2020 is no slouch — it is detailed and honest — but it has a little more self-noise and less low-end body.
Pros and cons
AT2020 pros: excellent value, compact, great first condenser. Cons: no pad or filter, higher self-noise, basic mount.
AT2035 pros: low-cut and pad add flexibility, lower noise, includes a shock mount, fuller sound. Cons: costs more and is physically larger.
Which should you choose?
- Choose the AT2020 if you are on a tight budget, recording vocals or instruments at moderate levels in a reasonably quiet room, and want the most mic for the least money.
- Choose the AT2035 if you record loud sources (the pad helps), want the low-cut filter, value lower self-noise for quiet passages, or appreciate the included shock mount.
Either way, technique matters as much as the mic — see how to record vocals at home and dial in clean levels with gain staging. For more options, browse the microphones category.
Frequently asked questions
Is the AT2035 worth the extra money over the AT2020?
If you want the low-cut filter, the pad for loud sources, lower self-noise and an included shock mount, yes. If you mainly record vocals at normal levels in a quiet room, the AT2020 already does a great job for less.
Do the AT2020 and AT2035 need phantom power?
Yes. Both are condenser microphones and require 48V phantom power, which your audio interface or mixer supplies. Switch it on before recording and off before unplugging.
Which is better for streaming and podcasting?
Both work well, but the AT2035’s low-cut filter and pad give you more control over room rumble and loud bursts, and the included shock mount reduces desk noise. The AT2020 is a fine, more affordable choice if your space is quiet.
Leave a Reply